{"id":13381,"date":"2023-07-26T19:28:26","date_gmt":"2023-07-26T17:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2023\/07\/26\/googles-chromecast-patent-case-puts-the-company-in-a-338-7-million-debt\/"},"modified":"2023-07-26T22:21:38","modified_gmt":"2023-07-26T20:21:38","slug":"googles-chromecast-patent-case-puts-the-company-in-a-338-7-million-debt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2023\/07\/26\/googles-chromecast-patent-case-puts-the-company-in-a-338-7-million-debt\/","title":{"rendered":"Google&#039;s Chromecast patent case puts the company in a $338.7 million debt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0Google Chromecast patent case\u00a0has been standing for some time now. After a legal trial, the court found that Google is guilty of the charges laid against it and must pay. Total damages from this case amount to $338.7 million as decided by the court last week.<br \/>\nThis case brings to light certain software elements on the Chromecast that are patents belonging to a tech company. The exact feature at the centre of this dispute is remote-sharing technology. With this feature, users can stream content across various screens using one device.<br \/>\nTouchstream claims ownership of this patent that they say Google stole and has been using for years. Google says that it didn\u2019t infringe any patent from Touchstream and the said patents are invalid. However, a court has found Google guilty and is imposing a fine of $338.7 million on the tech giant.<br \/>\nGoogle claims that the Chromecast patent infringement case is invalid<br \/>\nIn the tech industry, patent infringement cases are a constant feature, with various companies stealing the ideas of others. For clarification, a patent is a licence that gives the sole rights to an invention or idea to an individual or body for some time. Tech companies often use patents to protect their ideas or technological innovations that they are not yet ready to develop.<br \/>\nIn recent times, Touchstream has taken Google to court over a said\u00a0Chromecast\u00a0patent infringement. According to the company, they had the sole rights to this patent back in 2010. Their claim goes on to say that Google met them at this time regarding making use of this patent for Chromecast devices but was denied its request.<br \/>\nFast-forward to 2013, Google launched Chromecast devices for media streaming using this patent. Ever since then, Google has proceeded to develop the technology and launch more devices built around this idea. Touchstream is now legally fighting for what they say is rightfully theirs and they seem to have seen a measure of success.<br \/>\nThe federal jury in Waco, Texas that heard this case, has judged in favour of Touchstream. Google, on its part, is not happy about the $338.7 billion fee the court demands it pay in damages. The tech giant insists that it didn\u2019t infringe the patent but developed the software technology on Chromecast streaming devices.<br \/>\nTouchstream also claims that certain software features on other\u00a0Google Home devices\u00a0are part of their patents. To seek what they will consider a fair trial, Google might be appealing this court decision. More information on this patent infringement case between Google and Touchstream will become available in the coming weeks.<br \/>\nThe post Google&#8217;s Chromecast patent case puts the company in a $338.7 million debt appeared first on Android Headlines.&#013;<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Chromecast-With-Google-TV-2-1.jpg\" width=\"1268\" height=\"706\">&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ndroidheadlines.com&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0Google Chromecast patent case\u00a0has been standing for some time now. After a legal trial, the court found that Google is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":13382,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bez-kategorii"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13381"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13383,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13381\/revisions\/13383"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}