\nGoogle\u2019s CEO speaks out on AI and antitrust lawsuits against the company
\nDuring the latest DealBook Summit, Sundar Pichai revealed to The New York Times his position regarding the current situation in the AI \u200b\u200bsegment. The executive began by responding to Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, who said that Google should have been the \u201cdefault winner\u201d in the industry.
\nNadella refers to the fact that Google should have been ahead of everyone else by having access to daily usage and browsing data of millions of people, in addition to having the resources and technology to take advantage of it. However, the competition in the segment is quite tight, with OpenAI taking the lead in certain aspects. Regarding this, Pichai said he \u201cwould love to do a side-by-side comparison of Microsoft\u2019s own models and our [Google] models any day, any.\u201d It\u2019s noteworthy that Microsoft\u2019s current AI infrastructure heavily incorporates OpenAI technology.
\nContinuing on the topic of artificial intelligence, Sundar Pichai has a different view than Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. The Google CEO thinks that advances in the segment will slow down a bit next year. However, Google\u2019s search engine \u201cwill continue to change profoundly in \u201925.\u201d Therefore, it\u2019s possible that Google won\u2019t release as many groundbreaking AI-based innovations in 2025. The company would focus on working on its current products. The Mountain View giant recently launched Gemini 2.0 with impressive capabilities.
\nIn addition to AI, Pichai was asked about the antitrust lawsuits against the firm. However, the executive did not elaborate much in his response. He simply said that he has \u201cdeep faith in our [US] judicial system.\u201d Regarding the DOJ\u2019s proposal to break up the company by selling Chrome, Pichai says that he even projected the potential spinoff of some divisions. \u201cDo I expect in a 10-year time frame some of those to be independent public companies? The answer is yes,\u201d he said. However, whatever happens, he will remain in \u201cthe mothership,\u201d referring to Google.
\nTrump\u2019s arrival is \u201can opportunity\u201c
\nGoogle\u2019s CEO sees Donald Trump\u2019s arrival in the White House as \u201can opportunity.\u201d Pichai has been trying to smooth things over with Trump after a rocky relationship during the presidential campaign. The new US president-elect accused the company of giving prominence to negative news about him and lowering the visibility of positive news.
\nRecently, Trump reportedly met with Pichai and had also received some calls from him. Plus, Google is among the companies that donated $1 million to Trump\u2019s inauguration fund. Regarding the new president\u2019s impact on the firm\u2019s developments, Google\u2019s CEO believes that there are areas, such as energy, where Trump is \u201ccommitted to making a difference.\u201d Lately, Google has spent large amounts on power supply plants for AI and data centers.
\nPichai believes that Trump\u2019s arrival could help speed up product development at Google.
\nThe impact of AI on jobs and hiring
\nOne of the most controversial issues regarding the use of AI is the potential replacement of humans at workplaces. Recently, Google\u2019s CEO revealed to analysts that AI generates up to 25% of Google\u2019s new code. However, the human factor remains key to the review and certification of code. Google does not see AI as a threat to jobs but quite the opposite. The firm believes it can help increase productivity for engineers. Artificial intelligence may also make programming more accessible.
\n\u201cJust like blogging made the world of publishing, not everyone needs to be as good as you to get online and write something. And, you know, I feel the same with programming. I think 10 years from now, it will be accessible to millions more people,\u201d said Pichai.
\nStill, Google\u2019s CEO doesn\u2019t deny AI having a \u201cmarginal impact\u201d on hiring programmers in the future. He says Google\u2019s goal is that its \u201csoftware engineers will be more productive than ever before.\u201d The firm wants to be able to \u201cdo more things.\u201d \u201cSo it\u2019s not that you\u2019re looking to hire fewer people, but what can you accomplish with those people?,\u201d he added.
\nGoogle CEO on AI regulation and copyright
\nLegislation in the AI area is another topic of interest in the tech industry. Unlike other segments, there is not a common AI global regulation that shares many key points. There are even regions with no legislation on artificial intelligence at all. This is because the speed at which the segment has developed has far outstripped that of the legislators. Additionally, AI is advancing to the point where it can perform more tasks, rendering previous draft regulations obsolete.
\nGoogle\u2019s CEO is in favor of legislation around the AI segment. \u201cIt\u2019s not like you can bring a treatment in without going through all the regulatory approvals. So just because you\u2019re using A.I. doesn\u2019t change all of that, right?\u201d This position is similar to that of Sam Altman, who said that regulation was necessary.
\nPichai faced questions regarding the use of copyrighted material for AI training. The topic has gained prominence in recent years after a period of \u201cfree rein\u201d for tech companies. At the beginning, several AI-focused firms simply took whatever content they wanted from the internet. Media platforms were slow to respond, as it was a totally new situation with no regulations to fall back on or precedents for how to deal with it.
\nHowever, there have already been agreements between tech companies and publishers. This enables them to legally access the content on their platforms for the purpose of training AI. Not all have been successful, such as The New York Times, which is currently engaged in a legal dispute with OpenAI and Microsoft over the unauthorized use of its content. Conversely, The Associated Press and Reddit have struck agreements for their data, among others.
\nPichai believes that a segment of creators focused on AI platforms will emerge. \u201cI think there will be creators who will create for AI models, or something like that, and get paid for it,\u201d he said.
\nGoogle\u2019s shift on employee political activism within the company
\nA controversial issue that has affected Google recently has been employee activism within the company. Over the past decade, Google has become less permissive regarding political activism at its facilities. The firing of 28 workers for protesting against a contract with the Israeli government brought them some backlash. At the time, Googlers were warned that the company was not the place to \u201cfight over disruptive issues or debate politics.\u201d
\n\u201cThe company is not a personal platform, right? And I think for me, it\u2019s been a change for a while,\u201d Pichai said to The New York Times. Despite that, Google\u2019s CEO denies that the balance of power has tilted too much toward employers. \u201cI don\u2019t see it as a power dynamic, necessarily. I actually think it\u2019s resonating with a lot of employees, too,\u201d he added.
\nThe post Google’s CEO reveals position on AI, antitrust & Trump’s arrival appeared first on Android Headlines.
\n
![](\"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sundar-pichai-google-io-2021.png\")
\nSource: ndroidheadlines.com <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"