{"id":15339,"date":"2025-02-22T02:03:54","date_gmt":"2025-02-22T01:03:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2025\/02\/22\/phone-comparisons-oppo-find-n5-vs-samsung-galaxy-z-fold-6\/"},"modified":"2025-02-22T21:03:54","modified_gmt":"2025-02-22T20:03:54","slug":"phone-comparisons-oppo-find-n5-vs-samsung-galaxy-z-fold-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2025\/02\/22\/phone-comparisons-oppo-find-n5-vs-samsung-galaxy-z-fold-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Phone Comparisons: OPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OPPO managed to gain a lot of attention with the launch of its new foldable and for a good reason. The OPPO Find N5 is thinner than even the HONOR Magic V3, and in addition to that it brings a number of other improvements compared to its predecessor. In this article, we\u2019ll be comparing it to probably the most popular book-style foldable in the world. We\u2019ll be comparing the OPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6.<br \/>\nThese two phones are a lot different. They are both book-style foldable and have two displays, but are very different. We will first list their specifications, as per usual, and will then move to compare their designs, displays, performance, battery life, cameras, and audio output. Needless to say, there\u2019s a lot of ground to cover here, so let\u2019s get down to it, shall we?<br \/>\nSpecs<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 &amp; Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, respectively<br \/>\n\u2013 Screen size (main):<br \/>\n8.12-inch Foldable LTPO OLED (120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 2,100 nits peak)<br \/>\n7.6-inch Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display (120Hz, HDR10+, 2,600 nits peak)<br \/>\n\u2013 Screen Size (cover):<br \/>\n6.62-inch LTPO OLED (120Hz, 2,450 nits peak)<br \/>\n6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (120Hz, 1,600 nits peak)<br \/>\n\u2013 Display resolution (main):<br \/>\n2248 x 2480<br \/>\n1856 x 2160<br \/>\n\u2013 Display resolution (cover):<br \/>\n2616 x 1140<br \/>\n2376 x 968<br \/>\n\u2013 SoC:<br \/>\nQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7-core)<br \/>\nQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy<br \/>\n\u2013 RAM:<br \/>\n16GB (LPDDR5X)<br \/>\n12GB (LPDDR5X)<br \/>\n\u2013 Storage:<br \/>\n512GB (UFS 4.0)<br \/>\n256GB\/512GB\/1TB (UFS 4.0)<br \/>\n\u2013 Rear cameras:<br \/>\n50MP (wide, f\/1.9 aperture, 1\/1.56-inch sensor size, OIS, PDAF), 8MP (ultrawide, f\/2.2 aperture, 116-degree FoV, 1\/4.0-inch sensor size), 50MP (periscope telephoto, 1\/2.75-inch sensor size, OIS, 3x optical zoom, macro)<br \/>\n50MP (wide, f\/1.8 aperture, Dual Pixel PDAF OIS), 12MP (ultrawide, 123-degree FoV), 10MP (telephoto, 3x optical zoom)<br \/>\n\u2013 Front cameras:<br \/>\n8MP (main display, f\/2.4 aperture, 1\/4.0-inch sensor size), 8MP (cover display, f\/2.4 aperture, 1\/4.0-inch sensor size)<br \/>\n4MP (under display, main display, f\/1.8 aperture), 10MP (cover display, f\/2.2 aperture)<br \/>\n\u2013 Battery:<br \/>\n5,600mAh<br \/>\n4,400mAh<br \/>\n\u2013 Charging:<br \/>\n80W wired, 50W wireless, 5W reverse wired (charger included)<br \/>\n25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless (no charger)<br \/>\n\u2013 Dimensions (unfolded):<br \/>\n160.9 x 145.6 x 4.2 mm<br \/>\n158.7 x 139.7 x 5.8mm<br \/>\n\u2013 Dimensions (folded):<br \/>\n160.9 x 74.4 x 8.9 mm<br \/>\n153.5 x 68.1 x 12.1 mm<br \/>\n\u2013 Weight:<br \/>\n229 grams<br \/>\n239 grams<br \/>\n\u2013 Connectivity:<br \/>\n5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.4\/5.3<br \/>\n\u2013 Security:<br \/>\nSide-facing fingerprint scanner<br \/>\nSide-facing fingerprint scanner<br \/>\n\u2013 OS:<br \/>\nAndroid 15 with ColorOS 15.0.1<br \/>\nAndroid 14 with One UI 6.1.1<br \/>\n\u2013 Price:<br \/>\n$1,860<br \/>\n$1,699<br \/>\n\u2013 Buy:<br \/>\nN\/A<br \/>\nGalaxy Z Fold 6 (Samsung \/ Best Buy)<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Design<br \/>\nBoth of these phones are made out of metal and glass, and both are book-style foldables. Do note that the OPPO Find N5 also comes in a vegan leather back version, but only in China. Its global versions have glass backs. There\u2019s also some titanium in the mix, in the hinge department. Despite the fact they\u2019re both slippery and book-style foldables, they feel very different in the hand, and very different to use.<br \/>\nThe OPPO Find N5 is considerably thinner &amp; also lighter<br \/>\nThe OPPO Find N5 is shockingly thin, it actually feels like you\u2019re using a regular slab phone when it\u2019s closed. It\u2019s only 8.93mm thick, which is a lot thinner than the Galaxy Z Fold 6\u2019s 12.1mm. The difference is jarring, and the moment you pick both up you\u2019ll realize that. The OPPO Find N5 is also thinner when folded, 4.2mm vs 5.6mm, and it\u2019s also 10 grams lighter at 229 grams. Samsung\u2019s foldable actually feels like a tank compared to the OPPO Find N5, even though it is thinner and lighter than its predecessor.<br \/>\nOPPO\u2019s phone also has larger displays, both of them<br \/>\nOn top of that, it has a notably larger displays, both of them, so it\u2019s taller, and wider in both folded and unfolded orientations. Both smartphones have a display camera hole on their cover displays. The Find N5 has one on the main display too, while the Galaxy Z Fold 6 utilizes an under-display camera on the main display, which is also somewhat visible. The sides are flat on both smartphones, and both of them have a fingerprint scanner embedded into the power\/lock key. Speaking of which, the physical buttons sit on the right-hand side of both phones. Both of them have a standard set of physical keys.<br \/>\nThey offer completely different-looking camera setups on the back<br \/>\nIf we flip them around, you\u2019ll notice a camera oreo on the back of the OPPO Find N5. It includes three cameras, and it\u2019s centered in the upper portion of the phone. The protrusion on the back is much less noticeable than on the Find N3. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 also has three cameras on the back, and they\u2019re located in the top-left corner. They\u2019re vertically-aligned. OPPO\u2019s handset comes with IPX6, IPX8, and IPX9 certifications, while the Galaxy Z Fold 6 supports IP48 certification.<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Display<br \/>\nThe OPPO Find N5 features an 8.12-inch foldable LTPO OLED main display. That display is foldable, and it offers a resolution of 2248 x 2480. It can project up to 1 billion colors, while Dolby Vision and HDR10+ are supported, as is HDR Vivid. Its refresh rate is adaptive (1-120Hz), while the peak brightness here is 2,100 nits. The screen-to-body ratio is at around 90%, by the way.<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5<br \/>\nThe cover display on the phone measures 6.62 inches. It\u2019s an LTPO OLED display with a resolution of 2616 x 1140. It has an adaptive refresh rate (1-120Hz), and it can project up to 1 billion colors. Dolby Vision is supported, as is HDR10+ content and HDR Vivid too. The peak brightness here is 2,450 nits. This display is protected by the Nanocrystal Glass.<br \/>\nThe Galaxy Z Fold 6, on the other hand, comes with a 7.6-inch Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED main display. This display also has an adaptive refresh rate (1-120Hz), and it supports HDR10+ content. Its peak brightness is 2,600 nits. The screen-to-body ratio is at around 91%, and the resolution is 1856 x 2160.<br \/>\nOn the other hand, the cover display measures 6.3 inches, and it\u2019s a Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display. It offers an adaptive refresh rate (1-120Hz), and a resolution of 2376 x 968 pixels. It has a peak brightness of 2,600 nits, while the Gorilla Glass Victus 2 from Corning is in charge of protecting it.<br \/>\nAll four of these displays are actually really good. They\u2019re bright, vivid, and have good viewing angles. We also had no issues with touch response, They also get bright enough when they need to, all of them, basically. The OPPO Find N5 does have the advantage of supporting high-frequency PWM dimming, in case you have sensitive eyes.<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Performance<br \/>\nOPPO\u2019s new foldable is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, its 7-core version. That is a 3nm processor. The company also included 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM inside of the phone, along with 512GB of UFS 4.0 flash storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 6, on the other hand, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, an overclocked version of the standard version of the chip. This phone includes 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 flash storage. Neither handset supports storage expansion, by the way.<br \/>\nThe Galaxy Z Fold 6 does have a less powerful chip, a generation before the Snapdragon 8 Elite. The thing is, the difference is not that big at all, at least in terms of general performance, even though the Snapdragon 8 Elite is more powerful, no doubt about that. OPPO\u2019s phone, on the other hand, offers more RAM. Both smartphones do a great job in terms of performance, though. There\u2019s no lag on either phone, no matter how hard you push them during your daily routine. We really put threw everything we had on both, and they both passed with flying colors. If you do a direct comparison, however, the OPPO Find N5 is a bit snappier.<br \/>\nThe same can be said for gaming, actually. Yes, both of these phones can run games immensely well, and that goes for high-end games too. Yes, both phones do get quite warm if you\u2019re pushing them hard with games, but not too warm. They both do a good job with cooling, though the Find N5 does have an advantage in that area. In any case, you\u2019ll be good to go performance-wise regardless of which phone you choose.<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Battery<br \/>\nThe OPPO Find N5 features a 5,600mAh battery on the inside. OPPO used a silicon-carbon battery here, which explains how it managed to fit it on the inside. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 has a much smaller 4,400mAh battery. It does have smaller displays, but this is quite a major difference in terms of battery capacity. Does the OPPO Find N5 offer better battery life, though? Well, yes, notably better, even though the Fold 6 is not bad in that regard, not at all.<br \/>\nJust to give you an idea of how good the OPPO Find N5\u2019s battery life is. After a day and 10 hours of use, we managed to cross the 10-hour screen-on-time threshold, and have like 3% left in the tank. In that time, gaming was not a part of our usage, but everything else was, pretty much. The main display was used about a third of the time. The point is, you can get 9+ hours of screen-on time here, comfortably, at least we did.<br \/>\nThe Galaxy Z Fold 6 does not come close to such numbers, but crossing the 7-hour screen-on-time is easily possible, which will be more than enough for the vast majority of people. Your mileage may vary, though, of course, as your usage will be different than hours, as will the signal, apps, and so on.<br \/>\nWhen it comes to charging, the OPPO Find N5 simply obliterates the Galaxy Z Fold 6. It comes with 80W wired, 50W wireless, and reverse wired charging. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 supports 25W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. On top of the fact the Find N5 charges much faster, it also comes with a charger in the retail box, at least its global variant does.<br \/>\nOPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Cameras<br \/>\nBoth of these phones have three cameras on the back, but the implementations are different. The OPPO Find N5 features a 50-megapixel main camera (1\/1.56-inch sensor), a 50-megapixel periscope telemacro unit (1\/2.75-inch sensor size, 3x optical zoom), and an 8-megapixel ultrawide camera (1\/4-inch sensor size, 116-degree FoV). Hasselblad\u2019s color calibration is also a part of the picture.<br \/>\nSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6<br \/>\nThe Galaxy Z Fold 6, on the other hand, has a 50-megapixel main camera (1\/1.57-inch sensor size), along with a 10-megapixel telephoto camera (1\/3.94-inch sensor size, 3x optical zoom), and a 12-megapixel ultrawide unit (1\/3.2-inch sensor size, 123-degree FoV). So neither device has the very best camera hardware out there, not even close. Still, they both do a good job.<br \/>\nThe main cameras on the two phones are good, but they take different pictures. The Find N5 prefers contrastier shots, while the Galaxy Z Fold 6 leans more on the warmer side of the color temperature, and also still tends to oversaturate at times. The sharpening is more pronounced on the Galaxy Z Fold 6. Sharpening becomes more apparent on both phones as the light goes away, so in low-light situations. We did prefer the results from the Find N5 most of the time.<br \/>\nWhen it comes to zoomed-in shots, the OPPO Find N5 wins without a doubt, and it\u2019s not even close. It simply provides better pictures in essentially all scenarios. The Galaxy Z Fold 6\u2019s camera sensor is considerably smaller, and the phone doesn\u2019t even offer a periscope telephoto camera, not to mention a telemacro one. Neither ultrawide camera is all that special, but in all honesty, we preferred the Galaxy Z Fold 6\u2019s. We did stay away from both at almost all times, though, they\u2019re simply not that good.<br \/>\nAudio<br \/>\nIf you\u2019re wondering about audio, both of these phones come with stereo speakers. Neither set is anything special, in all honesty, as they\u2019re both a bit quieter than we\u2019re used to on flagship smartphones. Still, the Galaxy Z Fold 6 does bring more volume than the OPPO Find N5, and both sound satisfactory. They\u2019re both loud enough and offer good sound output.<br \/>\nThere is no audio jack on either of these two smartphones. You can utilize their Type-C ports for the same purpose, though, if you want. Alternatively, you do have access to Bluetooth 5.4 on the OPPO Find N5, and Bluetooth 5.3 on the Galaxy Z Fold 6.<br \/>\nThe post Phone Comparisons: OPPO Find N5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 appeared first on Android Headlines.&#013;<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/OPPO-Find-N5-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-Z-Fold-6-comparison.jpg\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1080\">&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ndroidheadlines.com&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OPPO managed to gain a lot of attention with the launch of its new foldable and for a good reason. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":15340,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bez-kategorii"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15339"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15339\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15341,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15339\/revisions\/15341"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}