{"id":741,"date":"2019-09-18T19:59:13","date_gmt":"2019-09-18T17:59:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2019\/09\/18\/att-accused-of-using-real-directv-now-subscribers-to-create-fake-subscriptions\/"},"modified":"2019-09-18T22:15:23","modified_gmt":"2019-09-18T20:15:23","slug":"att-accused-of-using-real-directv-now-subscribers-to-create-fake-subscriptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/2019\/09\/18\/att-accused-of-using-real-directv-now-subscribers-to-create-fake-subscriptions\/","title":{"rendered":"AT&amp;T Accused Of Using Real DIRECTV NOW Subscribers To Create Fake Subscriptions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AT&amp;T is accused of running fake schemes and using shady tactics to inflate DIRECTV NOW subscriber numbers.<br \/>\nThe claims are part of a lawsuit accusing AT&amp;T of fraud by investors.<br \/>\nThe accusations suggest AT&amp;T management\u00a0was involved and approved measures to intentionally defraud investors. These measures then trickled down the company resulting in actions by customer-facing employees.<br \/>\nFake DIRECTV NOW subscribers<br \/>\nOne of the most troubling claims is that AT&amp;T was signing real subscribers up to fake accounts. Apparently, AT&amp;T would take real subscriber phone numbers and add them to fake accounts. AT&amp;T would then bill those subscribers for the fake accounts.<br \/>\nThe fake accounts were also linked to fake email addresses. This was designed to limit real subscribers discovering the fake subscriptions, according to the suit.<br \/>\nThe claims suggest one phone number and credit card was routinely linked to three DIRECTV NOW subscriptions.<br \/>\nFraudulently charging AT&amp;T customers for DIRECTV NOW<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s not unheard of for a company to incorrectly charge a customer, although this is usually just an error. In this case, the suit states AT&amp;T was acting intentionally. According to the claims, the fraudulent activity was not limited to existing subscribers either. AT&amp;T customers who did not want DIRECTV NOW were signed up and billed anyway.<br \/>\nIn other instances, customers were charged for DIRECTV NOW, but told the charge was for something else. While some AT&amp;T customers were told DIRECTV NOW was already part of their bundle, when it wasn&#8217;t. Those customers were then charged for the additional service.<br \/>\nAgain, while mistakes happen, this claim specifically argues these were not mistakes. They were intentional actions designed to artificially inflate subscriber numbers.<br \/>\nThe DIRECTV NOW subscriber game<br \/>\nDIRECTV NOW experienced high levels of subscriber growth following AT&amp;T&#8217;s purchase of DIRECTV. For a long time, DIRECTV NOW and Sling TV were the runaway leaders in the live TV streaming sector.<br \/>\nThe suit says this is the reason AT&amp;T was doing what it&#8217;s now accused of. Arguing, the company wanted to project DIRECTV NOW as more valuable than it really was. Specifically, to investors.<br \/>\nThis is where the lawsuit comes in. It has been spearheaded by a group of investors who claim they were lied to by AT&amp;T.<br \/>\nThroughout 2019, DIRECTV NOW subscriber numbers have declined dramatically. AT&amp;T explained this is to be expected and part of a 'customer cleanup&#8217; process.<br \/>\nDIRECTV NOW was recently rebranded as AT&amp;T TV NOW.<br \/>\nAT&amp;T has since denied the claims.<br \/>\nThe post AT&amp;T Accused Of Using Real DIRECTV NOW Subscribers To Create Fake Subscriptions appeared first on Android Headlines.&#013;<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/DirecTV-Now-AH-NS-2019-05-600x338.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\">&#013;<br \/>\nSource: ndroidheadlines.com&#013;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AT&amp;T is accused of running fake schemes and using shady tactics to inflate DIRECTV NOW subscriber numbers. The claims are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":742,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bez-kategorii"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=741"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":743,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741\/revisions\/743"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plus.maciejpiasecki.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}